Bribery Bill Update

This post was written by Mark Hargreaves, Emma Parsons and Catrin Phillips.

Following on from our original blog on the Bribery Bill there have been some changes to the Bill during its speedy passage through Parliament. We have no doubt that this Bill will be enacted before the General Election. Agents, investors and developers do need to be aware of the new law and will be required to review internal procedures and contracts with those supplying services to them to ensure they minimise any risks of a criminal sanction.

Continue Reading...

Bribery Bill and the Property Industry

This post was written by George Brown,  Mark Hargreaves and Emma Parsons

Can the Bribery Bill, which we are told will become law before the General Election, affect property investors, agents and buyers?

Continue Reading...

Can landlords carry out environmental surveys during the lease term?

This post was written by Siobhan Hayes and Richard Nicoll.

Landlords/investors involved in selling or refinancing tenanted properties may need to carry out intensive environmental tests to satisfy the buyer/lender.  Can landlords do these without the tenant’s co-operation, for which a tenant may seek a high price?  Leases of commercial property reserve specific rights of entry for landlords.  Can these be exercised to allow an intrusive environmental investigation during the lifetime of a lease whilst a tenant is in occupation?  Without an express reservation, it is highly unlikely that any commercial property lease would be interpreted to permit an environmental survey that would disrupt the tenant from carrying out its normal business.

Continue Reading...

Leases: Risks to tenants when serving Break Notices

Effecting a lease break can be vital to a tenant’s business plans.  There are a vast number of reported cases on the question of whether notices have been validly served.  There are many more property lawyers’ files where the operation of a break is challenged.  Tenants need to take great care and seek legal advice to ensure they have exercised their break-right correctly.  Failure to do so may result in the tenant having to pay rent on a surplus property until lease expiry or until the next break date.

In the most recent case on the subject – Orchard (Developments) Holdings PLC v Reuters Ltd (2009) – some bad luck and an unusual break clause meant that the tenant was bound to its lease for a further five years.

  • The bad luck was that the person who served the formal notice on behalf of the tenant posted them through the wrong letterbox!
  • The unusual break clause allowed for informal service of notice by fax if receipt was acknowledged.  The landlord did not acknowledge receipt until the litigation started.
  • The break notice was held by the Court of Appeal not to have been validly served.

What can tenants do to avoid break notice pitfalls?

  • Review all of the terms of the lease relevant to the break and the termination of the lease well in advance of the break date.  This will be particularly important to check if the break is conditional on any matters – see below.
  • Check the notice provisions in detail (again in plenty of time) and comply with all the details
  • Check who the landlord is (e.g., by reference to the Land Registry title), and where and how notices may be served.  If the investment was sold to an offshore investor, service may be difficult and may take a week or more.
  • Never leave any decisions to the very last minute so that there is time to serve a break notice and get confirmation of receipt (re-serving if necessary)
  • Take legal advice early as it could save a fortune later.  If break clauses are conditional on compliance with, e.g., the tenant’s covenants in the lease, a new set of issues will have to be dealt with, and these will be the subject of other postings.